<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vlogolution network &#187; the wall street journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/tag/the-wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vlogolution.com/hot</link>
	<description>vlogolution is a new, hip video and blog network bringing you clever, informative, and unique infotainment such as HotRoast, PassMeThePork, and moMoneyTV.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 20:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s MOST IDIOTIC ARTICLE EVER!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/2009-04-21-the-wall-street-journals-most-idiotic-article-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/2009-04-21-the-wall-street-journals-most-idiotic-article-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HotRoast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic sans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiotic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wall street journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open letter to The Wall Street Journal: Dear WSJ Editor, I have an appreciation for typography. I really do. My current typeface crush is Cooper Black Swash Italic Traditional (and Custom) which you can see is used in our header here at HotRoast.com. I also have a great appreciation for your publication and have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_416" style="width: 430px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-416" title="Comic Sans Defends His Reputation" src="http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/wp-content/uploads/comicsans.png" alt="Arial and Comic Sans go to a bar and..." width="420" height="500" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ad Lib quickie!  Arial and Comic Sans go to a bar and __________ (fill in the blank in the comments  section below with a PRESENT-TENSE VERB).</p></div>
<p>An open letter to The Wall Street Journal:</p>
<p>Dear WSJ Editor,</p>
<p>I have an appreciation for typography.  I really do.  My current typeface crush is Cooper Black Swash Italic Traditional (and Custom) which you can see is used in our header here at HotRoast.com.  I also have a great appreciation for your publication and  have come to rely on its interesting, informative, conservative and most usually useful content.  After all, if I wanted silly and irrelevant I could simply journey to the comments section of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/vlogolution" target="_blank">my YouTube channel</a>.  However, I am frustrated by your editorial choices of late, one in particular titled <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123992364819927171.html" target="_blank">&#8220;Typeface Inspired by Comic Books Has Become a Font of  Ill Will&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>I believe it is safe to assume that many of your online readers, myself included, clicked on this asinine article because of its high rank under the &#8220;Most Popular&#8221; section of your website.  I would expect a title that includes such formidable phrases as &#8220;Ill Will&#8221; would feature a font fist fight over copyright infringements<strong></strong>.  Alas, to my disappointment, no.  Rather I find myself reading a feature that describes the creator of the Comic Sans font, Mr. Vincent Connare as a complete and total douche bag with no real point to the story whatsoever.</p>
<p>Perhaps you believe this 1,218 word editorial to be entertaining and whimsical.  Reading this piece, one would think we&#8217;re living through extremely uninteresting times.  So, how did something that reads like it&#8217;s from the faculty newsletter at the Art Institute Online end up published in <strong>YOUR PERIODICAL</strong>?  Seriously, have I mistook <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Wall Street Journal</span> for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Art Director&#8217;s Digest?</span></p>
<p>Mr./Ms. Editor, please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but aren&#8217;t newspapers having  an awfully tough time?  Why would you choose to alienate your readers, especially those who continue to pay a <strong>SUBSCRIPTION FEE</strong> with such <strong>NONSENSICAL DRIVEL</strong>?</p>
<p>The point I&#8217;m eloquently trying to make could better be expressed in the colorful language of a disgruntled YouTube viewer.  So here it goes; <strong>&#8220;NOBODY F&#8217;ING CARES ABOUT COMIC SANS SUCKING @SS!!! I WANT MY PAST 120 MINUTES OF MY LIFE BACK!!! WSJ, YOU ARE AN EPIC FAIL!  U JUST GOT OWNED!  WHATEVER THE HELL THAT MEANS! BLAHHHHHHH!!!&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Deeply Disturbed Roaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vlogolution.com/hot/2009-04-21-the-wall-street-journals-most-idiotic-article-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
